Video Summary
Merlin Strategy Group polls show sharply negative views of men among many women aged 18–25 while young men largely view women positively.
Hosts of the New Statesman podcast reflect that decades of radical, intersectional feminism and campus activism may have contributed to this shift.
Online spaces, feminist societies, and influencer culture are blamed for politicizing young women's social lives and dating choices.
Consequences include reduced interest in family formation, new voting blocs of single women, class-based differences in pessimism, and relationship breakdowns.
The polls found that favorable views of men are low among the youngest cohort — only about a third of women aged 18–25 have a positive view of men, while around 72% of young men view women favorably.
The hosts gradually conclude that radical intersectional outlets and earlier feminist messaging may have contributed to politicizing and demoralizing young women, prompting some accountability for these cultural effects.
Online spaces, influencers, and campus groups are described as radicalizing young women's social worlds — promoting anti-male narratives and making political purity a criterion for dating and social belonging.
Many young women reportedly avoid having children or traditional family roles; political alignment and ideological tests often outweigh personal compatibility, contributing to lower marriage and childbearing intentions.
Middle-class young women are depicted as especially pessimistic about life chances and more radical in politics, while ethnic minority women often report feeling more valued and optimistic; these divides shape voting intentions and emerging single-woman voting blocs.
"After generations of feminism, particularly from about 2010 onwards, about a third of young women just hate men. They have just been completely indoctrinated."
The speaker discusses a podcast from the New Statesman that revealed concerning statistics regarding young women's attitudes toward men, indicating that a significant number have developed negative feelings.
It is noted that only about a third of women aged 18 to 25 hold a positive view of men, showcasing a stark contrast where three-quarters of young men express positive feelings towards women.
The commentary emphasizes that many young women have been influenced by a narrative that paints men as evil, creating an imbalance in perceptions and relationships.
"The New Statesman has been a radical intersectional outlet for years... Did we do something wrong by teaching women to hate men?"
The hosts of the podcast gradually realize the consequences of the ideological narratives they have promoted over the years.
They reflect on their past articles that espoused radical feminist views and begin to question whether they have contributed to the animosity that women feel toward men and the wider world.
The speaker sarcastically highlights the lack of accountability often found within feminist circles, suggesting they are reluctant to recognize the impact of their teachings.
"There is a poison in our institutions... It is deliberately poisoning the minds of young women."
The commentary suggests that current educational and social institutions contribute to a widespread negative perspective among young women regarding men.
The speaker argues that a significant portion of young women exhibiting animosity toward men is not inherent but rather a product of systematic ideological influence.
The notion of societal consequence is raised, hinting at the potential employment repercussions for those perpetuating these views in the future.
"The poor guys are going out there without any defenses at all thinking, 'Oh, well, women are normal.'"
There is a notable dialogue about the disconnect between young men and young women's perceptions of each other.
The speaker emphasizes that many young men approach relationships with an assumption that they will be met with goodwill, unaware of the prevailing negativity harbored by many women.
It is highlighted that young women are often socially constructed to view men with hostility, suggesting a disheartening dynamic in modern dating and social interactions.
"I can't imagine my boyfriend at the pub with his friends talking about political issues, whereas that's basically all me and my friends talk about."
The podcast features insights from young women who are actively dating yet still express negative sentiments about their partners.
An example is shared where a woman feels conflicted about dating someone she holds contempt for, underscoring the deep-seated issues affecting relationship dynamics.
The commentary reflects on how personal relationships are influenced by broader societal narratives and how these negative perceptions can complicate individual connections.
"You've done something horrible to these women so they can't have normal lives and form normal relationships."
The discussion highlights how radical feminism has affected women's views on relationships and men. Many women have become so politicized that they cannot envision a relationship with someone who holds differing political opinions, particularly on contentious topics like Israel and Gaza.
This radicalization has led to a paradigm where individuals prioritize political alignment over personal compatibility, rendering relationship dynamics superficial and contentious.
As a result, a significant number of women have expressed that they cannot be in relationships with men who disagree with them on what are perceived as core moral issues, often related to foreign conflicts impacting their lives very little.
"Young women have become total fanatics for issues that don't even touch their lives."
The discussion notes that a substantial proportion of young women are unwilling to date men who contradict their views on unrelated political matters, which indicates a troubling trend toward uncompromising ideologies affecting personal relationships.
This has set a precedent where one’s political stance is now considered of utmost importance in romantic engagements rather than personal qualities or mutual interests, complicating potential relationships.
There is a growing concern regarding this dogmatic approach to dating, particularly as it becomes more common for women to equate political views with moral integrity, thereby excluding vast numbers of potential partners based solely on ideological differences.
"Young women's internet is politicized entirely and totally radical."
The reality of how young women and men engage differently with online content is outlined, showing that women's online spaces are saturated with radical left-wing ideologies.
Influencers targeting young women often promote content that is anti-establishment, anti-government, and anti-masculine, which feeds into a narrative of victimization and hatred towards men, exacerbating societal divides.
In contrast, the representation of male voices—often deemed problematic or toxic—highlights a growing concern about masculinity shaped by online discourse. This skewed perception shapes younger women’s attitudes and influences their relationships with men.
"Why is my Instagram feed trying to radicalize me against my own husband?"
The pervasive promotion of anti-male sentiments in online media is scrutinized, leading to feelings of animosity towards men, particularly among women with young children.
The assertion is made that there is a disparity in how men and women are portrayed in media, with malice directed toward men being normalized while similar sentiments towards women would not be tolerated.
This cultural phenomenon poses a potential threat to family structures as it undermines the arguments for cooperation and understanding between sexes, ultimately questioning the motivations behind content that stirs division rather than unity.
"Young women are hugely pessimistic about their own economic outlook."
Young women exhibit a significant level of pessimism regarding their economic futures, feeling that the economy does not work in their favor. This sentiment contrasts with young men, who do not share the same intensity of negative feelings.
Research indicates that while the economy is challenging for young people overall, young women may be experiencing relative advantages in certain areas, such as employment opportunities and pay. Despite this, they often remain discontented and overlook the struggles faced by young men in the labor market.
"The gender pay gap has reversed in young people; women are now ahead of men economically."
Data suggests that the gender pay gap has shifted, with young women achieving higher earnings compared to their male counterparts. This economic advancement for women is not widely acknowledged by those who feel left behind, particularly young men, who report feelings of betrayal in the face of perceived structural advantages for women.
Young women's dissatisfaction persists despite their objective economic improvements, leading to a portrayal of young men as the victims in this shifting economic landscape, which many women seem not to recognize.
"They are being politically radicalized by abstract issues online."
The presence of social media and online content plays a significant role in shaping young women's views, often fostering negative attitudes toward men and the economy. This digital radicalization can lead to young women developing an ideology that fails to align with their actual circumstances.
As younger women navigate their dissatisfaction, they tend to gravitate towards radical political views without fully understanding the implications of those beliefs or the reality of their circumstances, which can create internal conflict and unhappiness.
"Middle-class women are the ones feeling the most negative about their life chances."
A distinction exists between the pessimism of middle-class women versus those from working-class backgrounds. The former group tends to express more negativity towards social issues and their economic prospects, often as a result of being educated in environments that promote certain ideological views.
This negativity can be linked to a sense of entitlement and a disconnect from the real-life struggles faced by various socioeconomic classes. The inclination towards radical solutions, such as communism, reflects a profound misunderstanding of economic reality.
"Women are more empathetic than men, experiencing misogyny and violence from a young age."
Young women's lived experiences, particularly concerning issues of violence and misogyny, shape their perceptions and political beliefs. The notion that these experiences inherently lead to greater empathy highlights a key aspect of the differences in how genders process social issues.
The argument posits that women’s feelings of vulnerability are often amplified by a liberal ideology that overlooks biological and experiential differences between genders, contributing to feelings of fear and despondency about the future. The critique suggests this ideological framework ultimately fails to serve young women’s best interests.
"Is that something to consider?"
"Yes, men are different. Men's empathy is expressed differently, women's empathy is expressed differently."
"Nothing about these women is moral in my view."
"Who benefits from this? The answer is just them."
"You've ruined the relationships of young women and young men, and I assume for you guys you don't feel it's your problem."
The discussion centers around the perceived damage to the interpersonal relationships of young women and men, suggesting that some commentators feel disconnected from the repercussions of their societal actions.
There is a notion that in personal lives, some individuals may make and laugh at racist and sexist jokes but only stand against them if aligned with a sexual goal.
"Young white women, sorry, I should specify, think that the country is racist. Ethnic minority women do not overall think it is racist."
Findings indicate a significant disparity in perceptions of racism between young white women and ethnic minority women, highlighting that young white women are more inclined to view their society as racist.
Ethnic minority women, in contrast, are less likely to label their environment as racist and often express feelings of being valued and having positive outlooks about their future opportunities.
"Young ethnic minority women are much more likely to say they feel valued by the country."
Ethnic minority women report a greater sense of optimism regarding their life prospects, showing interest in improving their situation compared to their peers.
This segment emphasizes a stark contrast in feelings of belonging and future aspirations among different demographic groups, noting that minority communities may feel more positively about their circumstances than their white counterparts.
"This generation of women don't like the country. They don't feel a sense of national pride."
The conversation delves into how young women, particularly those influenced by certain ideologies, exhibit a lack of national pride and feel disconnected from their country, producing a sense of despair.
It suggests that societal narratives are potentially damaging these women's perceptions of their place within their own nation.
"They didn't feel a sense of hope regarding family or government."
Many young women express pessimism about their personal futures and societal conditions, feeling overwhelmed by negativity towards family and potential reforms.
The bleak outlook on life intricately ties into their reluctance to start families, as they perceive a hostile environment lacking in support and positivity.
"They're scared that reform might force them into family values that they don't have."
The discussion on family values notes a fear among some women that societal changes could impose traditional values on them against which they rebel.
The idea debunks the notion that personal desires for family and community can flourish when feelings of resentment toward society and men dominate their mindset.
"Secular modernity is just awful."
The narrative underscores the challenges presented by modern secularism on personal beliefs, suggesting that there may be a resurgence of interest in traditional values for stability and community cohesion.
It indicates a complex cultural tension where individuals are reevaluating their relationship with modern ideologies and the impact these have on their lives and aspirations.
"A lot of them definitely didn't want kids by 30... Almost all the young men said they wanted kids by 30, and basically none of the young women wanted to."
There is a significant disparity in the desires for family and relationships between young men and women. Research indicated that while many young men were eager to have children by the age of 30, young women expressed a strong reluctance towards this milestone.
This divide raises concerns about societal pressures and the prevailing attitudes towards traditional family structures among young women, suggesting a shift in priorities.
"The brainwash that has been put into these young women's heads to make them think that having children is the worst thing that can happen to them is incredibly powerful."
There appears to be a cultural indoctrination that frames motherhood and traditional family roles as negative experiences. This perception may influence young women's choices and relationships, leading them to fear rather than embrace these roles.
The discussion reflects on how young women are confronted with images and narratives that undermine the value of motherhood, creating mental barriers to pursuing traditional family life.
"You made it so they find it essentially impossible to form loving relationships... It's Donald Trump, it's Israel-Palestine, it's social justice, blah blah blah."
Political ideologies and abstract values are increasingly dominating the discourse among young women, leading to a detachment from forming personal connections.
The saturation of political and ideological content has skewed their perception of relationships, making them cynical about potential partners who do not share their views, thereby complicating social interactions and relationship-building.
"There is a split in terms of voting intention... Young men are still less likely to vote for reform than any other generation of men."
The political landscape is shifting, with young women gravitating towards the left, whereas young men are more resistant to aligning with progressive reforms. This presents a generational divide in political identity and voting behavior.
The poll trends suggest that young men in Britain diverge from global patterns, leaning towards social democracy instead of right-wing politics, indicating a unique political climate.
"They can't change their opinions without losing their jobs—it's groupthink at play, and there's no getting around this."
Many young women may feel trapped in their ideologies due to systemic pressures in their workplaces and educational environments, where conformity to certain views is required for career advancement.
This atmosphere of groupthink discourages open discussion of alternative perspectives, resulting in a homogenous ideological framework that stifles individual thought and exploration of diverse viewpoints.
"We've created a generation of spinsters; the feminist industrial complex has played a part in this."
The discussion points towards the unintended consequences of feminist ideologies and narratives, which may have contributed to an increase in single women and reduced interest in traditional relationships.
The concept of "Generation Spinster" reflects a cultural shift that emphasizes independence over partnership, yet it raises questions about the long-term implications for social cohesion and family structures.
"I think they could be in for quite a nasty surprise about how hard it is to get those voters back."
The discussion revolves around how young women are increasingly disillusioned with traditional political parties, particularly the Labour Party and Conservatives. There is a growing belief that these parties have failed to meet the needs of women voters, leading to low turnout rates among younger demographics.
The commentators suggest that there is an assumption within the Labour Party that women will eventually return to vote for them, which may no longer hold true. Instead, young women appear to be seeking alternatives rather than reverting to these old-party loyalties.
"There is literally a spinster voting block that's appearing at this point similar to men."
It's noted that there is an emerging voting block of single women who focus on issues like healthcare, childcare, and education, reflecting their personal experiences and responsibilities.
Gen Z women's concerns extend to broader political issues, such as climate change and international conflicts. However, these issues are viewed through a lens that may not immediately connect to their daily realities or personal struggles.
"They firmly see the solution to that through a redistributive lens."
Many young women are concerned about the rising cost of living and are inclined towards solutions that involve wealth redistribution, pointing towards a preference for policies that may resemble communism.
Interestingly, despite their economic grievances, they endorse policies that could exacerbate their challenges, which seems contradictory and reflects a deeper misunderstanding of the economic dynamics affecting their lives.
"They actually want the country to get weaker because that will help Donald Trump."
The dialogue highlights how specific political figures, particularly Donald Trump, loom large in the psyche of young women, influencing their perceptions of national politics.
There is an alarming trend in which opinions about foreign political figures dictate domestic political discourse, suggesting a disconnect from their immediate societal issues.
"It’s nice to admit that you are the villains and we are the heroes here."
The commentators reflect on how young, educated women often develop radical political views, driven by left-leaning narratives prevalent in academia and online platforms.
This has contributed to a sense of alienation among these women, who feel that their perspectives are validated within their social circles but are disconnected from the broader societal context.
"Overall women have a sort of plus two view of capitalism, but they have a much more favorable view of communism."
There's a notable shift in sentiments, with women expressing a more favorable view of communism compared to capitalism, indicating a potential realignment of economic ideologies in favor of leftist ideals.
This ideological tilt could have long-term implications for political and economic policies and reflects a significant change in how younger generations perceive traditional capitalist frameworks.
"They are so radical, they're so far to the left that to them, capitalism and fascism look like the same things."
In discussions about the younger generation, particularly those aged 18 to 25, there is a marked sentiment that they possess an overwhelmingly negative view of capitalism, to the extent that some express a more favorable perspective towards fascism. This radical viewpoint illustrates a significant disconnect with traditional economic ideologies.
The conversation touches on how the formative years of this cohort were characterized by exposure to extreme ideological influences, leading to their current beliefs. The assertion is made that the experiences and teachings during their academic years have considerably shaped their radicalized views.
“For them, COVID kind of was the communism.”
The pandemic has seemingly been a pivotal moment for many young individuals, with the lockdowns and restrictions not just affecting their daily lives but also reshaping their worldview. Some participants in the discussion noted that the lockdowns may have complemented their ideological leanings, as they found certain aspects of that experience agreeable.
Personal reflections reveal that while some individuals thrived in the environment created by lockdowns, thanks to stable remote work, others may have experienced the negative ramifications of isolation, compounding their feelings of detachment from society.
"The feminist society itself is the problem; it should be banned."
The conversation highlights a critical perspective on feminist societies within educational institutions. There is a strong suggestion that these groups contribute to the radicalization of young women by enforcing a narrative that promotes hostility towards men.
Participants draw comparisons between their own experiences with feminism in academic settings and those of current students, arguing that there has been a drastic shift towards a more pessimistic viewpoint that did not exist previously.
"They were being brainwashed… You just have no idea. Again, total midwits."
A line of thought suggests that younger generations have been subjected to various propaganda that has seeped into their educational curricula. The implication is that the ideas they are taught are designed to create discord and undermine traditional relationships, particularly with men.
This viewpoint establishes a claim that many of these women, now indoctrinated with politically charged concepts, are oblivious to the negative impact this has on their lives and society at large. The idea they are presented as free-thinking individuals is contested, as they are argued to be mere products of ideological manipulation.
"You thought you were being clever, you thought you were being educated when actually they were destroying you."
The repercussions of these ideological teachings are discussed in terms of personal and societal consequences. There is a lamentation over the realization that many women have not fared well under the influences they once embraced.
It prompts an inquiry into the broader implications of these teachings on relationships and societal cohesion. A stark contrast is drawn between those who managed to escape the psychological damage and those who have borne the brunt of it, effectively highlighting a significant divide within the female experience in modern society.
"Young men don't have it difficult in the dating market, but you still have the obligation to seek out the small fraction of women who are favorably disposed to men."
The speaker acknowledges the difficulties young men face in the dating landscape but emphasizes the importance of perseverance. He suggests seeking out women who have positive relationships and backgrounds, as they are more likely to support a traditional family structure.
There is a necessity to prioritize finding a compatible partner who can foster a healthy family environment for future generations.
"Feminism destroyed the trust women needed to let their husbands lead the family."
The speaker expresses discomfort with traditional gender roles as framed by some interpretations of feminism, arguing that a healthy marriage should not require women's submission but rather mutual respect and communication.
He stresses the importance of husbands making major decisions while also ensuring that their wives feel valued and included in the decision-making process.
"Women can become the third column that allows for native replacement."
The speaker critiques the political choices women are making, suggesting that their voting patterns are inadvertently contributing to societal changes that may undermine their own safety and well-being.
He points out the paradox where women's actions lead to outcomes they may not desire, particularly in the context of ethnic diversity and societal stability.
"All feminist politics seems to boil down to being angry that a man might have something she doesn't."
The discussion highlights a perceived grievance among some women regarding men and their achievements, leading to a societal narrative that diminishes men's value.
The speaker believes that this will ultimately hurt women's prospects for marriage, as they may out-earn their male counterparts, creating an imbalance in relationships.
"Young men experience 20 times more misandry than existing misogyny."
The realization that young men often feel targeted in a system that they perceive as biased against them is central to the argument.
The notion that societal narratives foster conflict between genders is challenged, suggesting that the feminist framework might inadvertently harm both men and women by perpetuating divisions rather than fostering understanding.
"Notice how they describe the reactions to tragedy: men take action to do good. Women stop action to feel bad."
This statement draws a distinction between how men and women typically respond to crises, suggesting that men are more action-oriented while women may dwell on the emotional aspects.
The speaker argues that a problem-solving approach is the most empathetic course of action, asserting that this perspective reflects a deeper understanding of how to address issues effectively.
"I just can't fake it. And I don't like Pascal's wager. I feel it is insulting not just to faith, but if there is a God, I don't think he's going to accept Pascal's wager, frankly."
The speaker expresses a nuanced view on faith, particularly Christianity, indicating a respect for believers while asserting a personal inability to adopt a faith insincerely.
They critique Pascal's wager as a simplistic and potentially disrespectful approach to belief, underscoring their desire for honesty in matters of faith.
"In Britain in particular, it's about a third of young women genuinely hate men."
The speaker shares their perspective on the dynamics between genders, suggesting an alarming trend among some young women in Britain who harbor animosity towards men.
They reference the "red pill" and manosphere as significant influences that resonate with their conservative Christian outlook, reinforcing a sense of shared frustration among certain demographics.
"I can do a better job and really explain the depths and the horror that the British Empire was saving people from."
The speaker intends to revisit a past discussion about the slave trade, aiming to provide greater clarity on the complexities of imperial history.
Their assertion indicates a belief that many are unaware of the harsh realities that existed during that time, which the British Empire aimed to improve.
"Abolish voting for individuals, have voting for families."
The speaker advocates for a radically different voting system that would strengthen family units and prevent ideological divisions between men and women, stemming from socialist influences.
They suggest that current systems allow for divisive politics, particularly concerning men and women's roles in society.
"You don't have a choice. You either do believe or you don't believe."
The speaker emphasizes their struggle with belief, asserting that faith should come organically rather than through compulsion or societal pressure.
They recognize the challenges atheists face in acknowledging broader societal issues without resorting to apologetics for their stance.
"After I did my master's, I was just like, 'Yeah, it's all bad. It's all bad.'"
The speaker's educational background has led them to a firm critique of liberalism in all its forms, suggesting a desire for a return to basic human values focused on community and individual goodness.
They convey a rejection of ideology for its own sake, instead advocating for genuine positive actions within society.
"I'm currently getting my garage converted to a new office."
The speaker shares updates regarding their living situation and plans for more effective content creation in the future, indicating a temporary hiatus from live streaming due to moving challenges.
There’s an acknowledgment of the audience's support during this transition, framing their future engagements as more structured and accessible.
