Video Summary

The who's who of Putin's inner circle in Russia.

Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW)

Main takeaways
01

The Feb 21, 2022 Security Council meeting was a staged legitimacy exercise that bound elites to Putin's war.

02

Russian rule operates as patrimonialism: Putin treats the state as personal property and leases power to trusted clients.

03

Five clans control strategic sectors (defense, agriculture, transport, energy) and place clients across the bureaucracy.

04

Independent 'Putinists' (e.g., Medvedev, Miller, Mishustin, Kadyrov, Nabiullina) hold influence outside clan structures.

05

Putin's family (daughters active in medicine and biotech) are linked to strategic state interests and networks of benefit-sharing. "War-time" elites promote veterans but real career gains are limited and often reput

Key moments
Questions answered

What does 'patrimonialism' mean in the Putin era?

Patrimonialism here means Putin treating the state as his personal property, delegating parts of government and corrupt income sources to trusted allies who then expand his control and pay tribute.

Who are the 'clans' and what do they control?

Five Kremlin-centred clans consist of long-standing patrons with close access to Putin; they control strategic sectors like defense, agriculture, transport and energy and place clients across the bureaucracy.

Who are examples of independent Putinists?

High-profile figures who are influential but not clan members include Dmitry Medvedev, Alexey Miller, Mikhail Mishustin, Ramzan Kadyrov and Elvira Nabiullina.

How has the war reshaped Russia's elite?

Wartime politics elevate combat veterans symbolically to build a patriotic elite, but real career and economic opportunities for veterans are limited and often tokenistic.

Why are members of the elite afraid to show disloyalty?

The elites face surveillance (mainly from the FSB), asset confiscations framed as anti-corruption, and collective complicity that discourages betrayal and enforces loyalty.

What are the main post-war risks for Russia's elite?

If the war ends, suppressed economic and social grievances and contested property rights could trigger political tensions and violent competition among factions without a prepared successor.

Putin's Decision and His Inner Circle 01:16

"But the decision had already been made. This spectacle, which consisted of asking their opinion, was only meant to legitimize a decision taken unilaterally."

  • The meeting of the Security Council on February 21, 2022, was a facade where Putin sought the opinions of his advisers regarding the recognition of independence for the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics.

  • Those who expressed doubts about this course of action were swiftly silenced, indicating a predetermined outcome that aimed to legitimize the full-scale war against Ukraine.

  • This approach effectively binds the Russian ruling elite to the decision, implicating them in the illegal aggression and potential war crimes associated with it.

The Concept of Patrimonialism 03:04

"The logic of governing Russia in the Putin era is based on the principle of patrimonialism."

  • The governance style in Russia under Putin can be characterized by patrimonialism, where Putin is viewed as the owner of the state and its resources.

  • He relies on a network of connections to maintain control, leasing parts of government and corrupt income sources to trusted allies who reinforce his power.

  • These connections allow these officials to leverage not just financial resources but also the bureaucratic apparatus and media to amplify their influence.

The Role of the Clans 04:32

"Putin treats Russia as his own property, and he leases out part of the state and sources of corrupt income to people he trusts."

  • The Russian political landscape consists of various clans that maintain close relationships with Putin, granting them influence and access to decision-making processes.

  • These clans manage significant economic assets crucial to the state, including defense, agriculture, transportation, and energy sectors.

  • By controlling these industries, they can lobby for favorable policies and fill key bureaucratic positions with their affiliates, thereby reinforcing their power.

Independent Putinists and Influential Figures 06:16

"Among them, Dmitry Medvedev, Alexey Miller, Mikhail Mishustin, Ramzan Kadyrov, and Elvira Nabiullina."

  • Aside from clan members, there exists a group known as independent Putinists who hold substantial power within the administration but do not belong to any specific clan.

  • These individuals include high-profile figures like Dmitry Medvedev and Elvira Nabiullina, who have critical roles in the stabilization and governance of the Russian economy amidst ongoing sanctions and wartime challenges.

Putin's Family Connections 06:56

"Putin's daughters, Katerina and Maria, are a particularly interesting topic. They operate in a rather peculiar business."

  • Putin's family members, including his daughters, are involved in sectors that align with his interests, specifically in medicine and biotechnology.

  • Their roles are not merely business ventures; they also serve the strategic interests of Putin and the broader security apparatus, framing their activities within a narrative of national defense against perceived threats.

Reconstructing Elites in Times of War 09:09

"Putin is dealing with a new project: the reconstruction or rebirth of the nation in the flames of war."

  • A shift towards creating a new patriotic elite has been initiated by highlighting veterans of the Ukrainian invasion as heroes, contrasting them against the oligarchs of the past.

  • The aim is to discipline the old elite while demonstrating social mobility through wartime experiences, promoting the idea that military service can lead to significant social advancement.

  • This new elite is intended to integrate combat veterans back into state structures, providing them with opportunities that can help maintain the government's control while reducing potential insubordination among those with military experience.

The Limitations and Challenges of Russian Veterans 10:58

"The state does not provide these people with actual career prospects; it remains mainly declarative."

  • Russian veterans are often placed in low-level municipal roles lacking real power or financial resources due to strong resistance from the old elites who are unwilling to share the diminishing state assets.

  • The state implements patriotic education programs for veterans, portraying the war in an exclusively positive light, and engaging them in activities such as teaching youth about operating drones and weapons.

  • While there are initiatives to support business activities for war veterans, these mainly serve a propagandistic purpose without tangible benefits in terms of career opportunities.

  • A notable trend is that some war "veterans" who ascend in bureaucratic roles may not have actually served on the front lines but instead leveraged previous positions of power to legitimize themselves through often fictitious front-line services.

The Power Dynamics Among Russian Elites 12:33

"The Russian elite currently has two goals: to maintain their position in the power struggle and to prepare for the moment when Putin is gone."

  • Recognizing that Putin's reign is not eternal, the ruling elites in Russia focus on preserving their influence and securing personal safety amidst fierce competition for resources and power within the current regime.

  • In the long term, they aim to position themselves favorably for an eventual power struggle that will ensue after Putin's departure, emphasizing the necessity of building strong economic bases and client networks.

Potential Successors and the Political Landscape 13:15

"The following are considered more likely candidates for succession: Dmitry Patrushev, Alexey Dyumin, Moscow Mayor Sergey Sobyanin, and Sergey Kiriyenko."

  • The video outlines several key figures viewed as potential successors to Putin, primarily including Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin and others with varying degrees of influence within the government.

  • Sergey Kiriyenko is noted for his increased assertiveness in recent years, having expanded his reach over key areas including foreign policy and propaganda efforts related to occupied territories.

The Nature of Loyalty and Fear Among the Elite 15:59

"The elite is under surveillance by the services, primarily the FSB, and these people are simply afraid to show any disloyalty."

  • Loyalty among Russian elites is enforced through a structure of fear, largely stemming from constant surveillance by the state, particularly the FSB.

  • The brutal Darwinist nature of Russian elite society fosters distrust among members, as they are wary of betraying one another due to the potential repercussions.

  • The Kremlin has heightened the stakes of loyalty in recent years, as widespread asset confiscation has occurred under the guise of an anti-corruption campaign, revealing a deeper struggle for power rather than a genuine effort to root out corruption.

The Role of Corruption in Maintaining Order 20:02

"The fight against corruption in Russia has always existed under Putin and was never about combating corruption."

  • The current anti-corruption narrative serves more as a political tool than a means for genuine reform, used to demonstrate the state’s authority by punishing lesser members of the elite while allowing the most significant corruption at high levels to remain unaddressed.

  • This tactic effectively curbs the ambitions of higher-ranking elites and ensures compliance through both intimidation and the promise of protection, maintaining a fragile balance of power within the regime.

Nationalization and Asset Confiscation in Russia 20:25

"Nationalizing or confiscating assets from individuals and groups labeled as corrupt generates revenue for the state budget."

  • The Russian state is increasingly focusing on nationalizing or confiscating assets from those it deems corrupt, which has become a strategic measure for generating revenue.

  • Investigations into companies and assets privatized during the 1990s have intensified, with the Russian Prosecutor's Office claiming that many of these transactions were illegal.

  • New regulations allow the state to revisit past privatizations, declare them invalid, and seize properties from their owners, instilling a climate of fear among asset holders who are apprehensive about losing their investments.

The Uncertain Future of Property Rights 21:13

"In reality, there are no longer any guarantees of property rights in Russia."

  • The climate of property rights in Russia has become highly uncertain, with property always being somewhat conditional, creating an environment where individuals feel increasingly vulnerable.

  • Previously, those who obtained assets through the economic transformation felt relatively secure unless there were clear signs of political disloyalty, which could lead to confiscation.

  • Currently, arbitrary criteria for nationalization and redistribution are used to discipline the elites amid the challenges facing the country and its leader during wartime.

Post-War Concerns and Elite Tensions 22:01

"If the war ends, all these issues will immediately rise to the surface and may become a source of political and social tensions."

  • Should the conflict come to an end, suppressed issues around the economy and social policies will surface, potentially leading to significant political unrest.

  • The propaganda-driven "besieged fortress" narrative has allowed the state to sidestep discussions about the economy and the future, despite deepening cuts to social policies while continuing to fund military and internal repression.

  • The ongoing war and international sanctions have led to an economic crisis in Russia, setting the stage for greater internal strife among the elite over dwindling resources.

Potential Power Struggles and Succession Issues 23:04

"Unless a successor to Putin is selected in advance, we should expect some turbulence."

  • If President Putin were to lose his ability to govern, various clans and key figures in the power system would likely struggle for control, potentially leading to violent conflicts as each faction would activate its own resources.

  • Without a consensus among the elite regarding a successor, the likelihood of political turbulence increases as different factions vie for power in an environment marked by instability.