Video Summary

Aussie Lawyer Breaks Down Ben Roberts Smith Arrest

James Glissan

Main takeaways
01

Roberts‑Smith was arrested and charged with war crimes in a civilian court — not a court martial — because war crimes are criminal offences prosecuted under the Commonwealth Criminal Code.

02

Australia can prosecute alleged conduct in Afghanistan via extraterritorial jurisdiction incorporated into domestic law after ratifying the Rome Statute.

03

Civil findings (like defamation) use the balance of probabilities; criminal prosecutions require proof beyond reasonable doubt and are separate processes.

04

Proving war crimes is complex: prosecutors must establish each legal element amid chaotic, overseas evidence; trials can take years.

05

Australia's open‑justice principle makes public, jury trials the default, though national security or classified material can lead to closed hearings or special procedures.

Key moments
Questions answered

Why isn't this being handled as a military court martial?

Roberts‑Smith is currently a civilian and war crimes are criminal offences under the Commonwealth Criminal Code, which are prosecuted in civilian courts. Court martials deal with military discipline for serving members.

How can Australia charge acts that allegedly happened in Afghanistan?

Australia has extraterritorial jurisdiction in its criminal law (partly via incorporation of the Rome Statute), allowing prosecution of Australian citizens or ADF members for war crimes even when the conduct occurred overseas.

Do the earlier civil (defamation) findings determine the criminal case?

No. Civil cases are decided on the balance of probabilities, while criminal trials require proof beyond reasonable doubt. Civil findings do not automatically decide criminal liability, though they may be relevant evidence.

Will the trial be public or held in secret?

Australia's default is open justice and public jury trials, but parts of the process could be closed or use special procedures if classified national security material is involved.

What should we expect about timeline and bail?

Cases involving war crimes and overseas witnesses are complex and likely to take years; bail is contested in serious matters where life sentences are possible and is not guaranteed.

Overview of the Case Against Ben Roberts-Smith 00:00

"Ben Roberts-Smith, Australia's most decorated living soldier, was arrested at Sydney airport and charged with war crimes."

  • Ben Roberts-Smith, recognized as one of Australia's most decorated soldiers, is now facing serious legal issues as he was arrested at an airport and charged with war crimes.

  • Former police officer and current criminal defense lawyer, James Glisten, is aiming to clarify the misunderstandings surrounding this case by explaining the legal frameworks involved.

Why Is This Not a Military Trial? 01:51

"A court marshal, the military side, is designed for serving members of the military. It deals with military discipline."

  • The trial is being conducted in a civilian court rather than a military court, which is intended for military personnel and specific to issues around military discipline.

  • Roberts-Smith is currently a civilian; thus, the military jurisdiction no longer applies to him. Even if he were still serving, war crimes are classified as criminal offenses, which are addressed in civilian courts.

Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Australian Law 04:05

"This is something called extraterritorial jurisdiction. In certain circumstances, Australian criminal law applies to conduct by Australian citizens and military personnel, regardless of where it occurred."

  • Australian law allows for the prosecution of its citizens and military members regardless of where alleged crimes take place, due to extraterritorial jurisdiction.

  • This framework has been intentionally established to ensure that serious offenses like war crimes can be prosecuted in Australia even when they occur abroad, as outlined in the Commonwealth Criminal Code.

"Yes and no. The earlier proceedings were a defamation trial. Ben Roberts Smith sued a group of newspapers for defamation."

  • There have been prior legal proceedings involving Roberts-Smith, specifically a defamation trial where he sought damages against newspapers, but those were civil matters judged on the balance of probabilities.

  • The current prosecution is a criminal case, which demands a higher standard of proof: the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a significant legal distinction from civil trials.

Complexity of Proving War Crimes 07:14

"The prosecution needs to try and establish every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt."

  • Proving war crimes involves demonstrating specific elements that are complex, such as establishing direct responsibility for alleged killings and proving that the conduct meets the legal definition of a war crime under Australian law.

  • The nature of these events, occurring in a war zone, adds complexity due to the chaotic environment from which evidence must be gathered, making it particularly challenging for the prosecution.

Open Justice: Public Trials in Australia 08:29

"Australia has a principle called open justice. The default position is that trials are public."

  • Australian legal principles dictate that trials should generally be accessible to the public, reinforcing the idea of transparency in the justice system.

  • The expectation is that this high-profile case will likely be a jury trial, allowing ordinary citizens to witness the proceedings, though some aspects may involve classified information.

"Ben Roberts-Smith has been arrested and charged. He will appear before a court, and the question of bail will need to be dealt with."

  • Ben Roberts-Smith's situation involves serious charges, which lead to questions regarding bail. In cases of this magnitude, where life imprisonment is a potential penalty, obtaining bail is not guaranteed and is likely to be contested.

  • Following the arrest, the case will transition into a pre-trial phase, which will include case management hearings and legal discussions about the admissibility of evidence, particularly concerning national security concerns.

"Cases of this complexity, with this volume of evidence and witnesses potentially located overseas, will more than likely take years."

  • The intricacy of cases that intersect military power, international law, and criminal justice can lead to prolonged legal battles. The process is expected to be lengthy due to the complexity of evidence and the involvement of international testimonies.

  • It's crucial to understand the legal system's operations, which can be convoluted, to make informed opinions rather than reactive judgments based on limited information.

"Understanding the process, even when it’s slow and complicated, is how you cut through the noise."

  • Grasping the intricacies of legal proceedings is more important than emotional reactions, as it helps in navigating discussions surrounding the case effectively. Encouraging open dialogue about the case can enhance understanding for everyone involved.