Why does Candace Owens criticize Trump's Truth Social post?
She says the post was irrational, lacked truth, and harmed Trump's credibility by needlessly insulting influential media figures instead of addressing substantive issues.
Video Summary
Owens directly responds to a Truth Social post from Trump that insulted several media figures, calling it irrational and damaging.
She argues Trump is being influenced by advisers and donors whose priorities (including pro-Israel interests) conflict with his past promises.
Owens claims money and external pressure — including a reported $100M expectation tied to West Bank policy — explain some of Trump's shifts.
She says loyalty matters: disloyalty from advisors erodes a leader's ability to hold support and may have hollowed out Trump’s base.
Owens prioritizes 'America First' over MAGA identity and suggests the movement is at risk, while promoting a cultural turn toward Christian values.
She says the post was irrational, lacked truth, and harmed Trump's credibility by needlessly insulting influential media figures instead of addressing substantive issues.
Owens points to close advisers and influential donors — including figures like Laura Loomer and reported pro-Israel donors — whose priorities she argues have pushed Trump away from prior promises.
She recounts a claim that Miriam Adelson offered $100 million with expectations tied to annexing the West Bank, suggesting monetary pressure shaped policy decisions.
Owens expresses disillusionment, saying MAGA has lost momentum for some supporters; she emphasizes 'America First' and shifts toward a cultural, Christian-focused message.
She argues that perceived disloyalty by advisors erodes a leader's ability to maintain support and can render a leader 'mentally and emotionally unfit' to continue.
"What is it ultimately that collapses an empire? What makes an emperor weak or strong?"
Candace Owens reflects on the fragility of empires and the psychological dynamics of leadership, particularly focusing on what makes leaders feel threatened.
She explains that in stories like gladiator movies, the wealthy elites often begin to feel insecure when a slave or an underdog starts commanding the audience’s attention, signifying a shift in power.
This phenomenon raises questions about the deeper implications of power structures and societal hierarchies.
"When does that happen? That's not a rhetorical question, Mr. President. I know the answer. It is when a slave begins to command the crowd."
Owens emphasizes that the true threat to the political elite arises not from a desire for their power but from the ability of marginalized voices to resonate with the public.
She draws a parallel with the late Charlie Kirk, noting that despite his money and fame, he lacked true freedom and was perceived as a threat because of his influence over the crowd.
The impact of such influential figures is lasting; even after death, their ideas and momentum can continue to mobilize a crowd.
"Only a fool would have thought to hit send on what you published on Truth Social last night."
Owens criticizes Trump for recent derogatory comments directed at various figures in media, suggesting that such remarks are out of touch with reality.
She argues that Trump's insults, although once effective, lack substance and reflect irrationality, particularly when aimed at intelligent and influential individuals.
By framing these comments as damaging to his reputation and credibility, she points out that mocking others for their intellect does not serve a constructive purpose.
"Traditional cable news no longer moves the needle."
Owens explains that the landscape of media has dramatically changed, with newer platforms far surpassing traditional cable news in influence.
She highlights that influential figures now operate outside of the traditional media circuits, using their platforms to reach audiences directly.
By overlooking this shift and continuing to engage with insult-driven rhetoric, Trump risks alienating himself from the reality of modern media dynamics.
"Are you aware that your base is comprised of blue-collar workers who never went to college?"
Owens points out an inherent contradiction in Trump's statement regarding education and intelligence, considering his support base consists largely of individuals who either did not attend college or chose not to.
She stresses the importance of recognizing the real-world experiences and capabilities of his supporters, arguing they are just as competent, if not more so, than those within his political circle.
This discussion serves to remind leaders that understanding and relating to one's base is crucial to maintaining their support and respect.
"Do you understand that no one in MAGA truly cares about money above truth and protecting children?"
Candace Owens challenges President Trump on his priorities, emphasizing that true supporters of the MAGA movement are more concerned with justice for children than wealth.
She questions Trump's apparent focus on financial gain and asks why he seems to protect individuals who have harmed children, specifically referencing the Epstein files.
"People will not fight beside, behind, or for someone who is fundamentally disloyal."
Owens asserts that disloyalty erodes trust and undermines Trump's ability to rally supporters effectively.
She critiques his reliance on advisors who may not have America's best interests at heart and warns that he risks losing the loyalty of his base.
"You chose money above respect, and what an absolute shame that you chose to do that toward the end of your life."
Owens reflects on Trump's legacy, suggesting that his choices may lead to a tarnished reputation and disappointment among his supporters.
She posits that history will depict him as a leader who failed to uphold the values originally associated with the MAGA movement.
"You are citing CNN but also dissing CNN for having produced certain polls."
Owens points out the contradictions in Trump's statements regarding the media, illustrating confusion in his communications.
She encourages him to clarify his thoughts, hinting that his mixed messages may alienate supporters rather than unite them.
"If you make me choose between America First and MAGA, it's America First all day."
Owens reiterates her commitment to prioritizing America’s interests over broader MAGA ideals, demonstrating a shift in her support away from Trump.
She expresses disappointment that Trump has aligned with individuals who do not embody the core values of the movement and has strayed from his original mission.
"You are just going against everyone that fought for him to win just because of the Epstein files and being at war with Iran for Israel."
Candace Owens expresses her disillusionment with Donald Trump, stating that he has abandoned his core supporters due to scandals involving Epstein and conflict with Iran.
She argues that it is time for Trump to resign or face consequences, as he is "mentally and emotionally unfit" to be the President of the United States.
Owens considers herself a former supporter, reflecting on the chaos Trump has caused in the country by aligning with what she calls a "monster."
"What is being implied there is that there is no truth and there is no loyalty within you."
Owens highlights a recurring sentiment from social media about Trump, emphasizing a trend of people questioning his loyalty and truthfulness.
She mentions a particular tweet referencing Charlie, implying that if certain truths were acknowledged, it would lead to severe consequences.
The implication drawn is that Trump has lost any sense of loyalty to his supporters, leading Owens to feel pity for him rather than anger.
"You are surrounded by advisers who hate you to their core."
Owens discusses how Trump is surrounded by advisors who do not have his best interests in mind and may encourage him towards self-destructive behaviors.
She believes this is due to their perception of him as weak and suggests that they manipulate Trump for their own ends.
She concludes with a poignant observation that Trump has become what he once criticized in others, particularly referencing Hillary Clinton.
"Who is guiding that?"
Owens examines the shift in Trump’s policies and actions, questioning what caused him to abandon previous promises of peace and to embrace aggressive military actions.
She refers to Megyn Kelly’s discussion with Piers Morgan, raising critical questions about Trump’s decision-making and alliances, particularly regarding Israel.
The narrative paints a picture of confusion about Trump's motivations, especially in light of advice from key military and political figures indicating he should not trust certain influences.
"He is facing a level of pressure that is dark enough to make him abandon his campaign promises."
Owens relates her thoughts following Trump's social media posts in which he attacks former allies, indicating a climate of high pressure and conflict.
She argues that Trump is under relentless scrutiny and demands, particularly from those who support Israel, making it difficult for him to adhere to his campaign promises.
The intense pressure described is portrayed as potentially overwhelming for any leader, showing the consequences of external influences on political decisions.
"He would not have let that happen unless his personal stakes were really high. We hope he overcomes."
"It's very kind of them. It is good to have grace."
"What Charlie and Andrew Kolb told me was that she said that she wanted in exchange for Trump to allow them to annex the West Bank."
"I find it very strange that Donald Trump is not interested or has appeared to be completely disinterested in determining who fired that shot."
"One of his top advisors is a certifiable lunatic."
"I'm the one that sent the president Tucker Carlson's clips so he can see what he says about him."
"The true death cult is Israel. They are murderous."
"I don't even believe Trump today would get the support of Jewish Americans."
"People were just saying, 'This is the end of MAGA. MAGA is dead.'"
Candace Owens reflects on the sentiment among some supporters that the MAGA movement has lost its momentum. She likens her feelings to those of Charlie Kirk, hinting at a pervasive sense of defeatism within certain circles.
Despite the negativity surrounding the movement, Owens promotes new merchandise, insisting that while some claim "MAGA is dead," there's still vigor beneath the surface, supported by her new product line which emphasizes a return to Christian values.
She introduces a new motto: "We need to make America Christian again," suggesting a focus shift towards a spiritual revival rather than purely political objectives.
"Thank goodness for this special appearance today. We have missed our girl."
Candace reads comments from her audience, who express gratitude for her return and support amid current events. One viewer praises her beauty and refers to a bizarre comparison made by someone else, emphasizing the absurdity of the remark and her strong presence.
Other viewers share sentiments about the urgency of faith and communal strength against the backdrop of divisive politics, with a particular emphasis on transcending the traditional left vs. right narrative.
Owens resonates with the audience's discontent with political leaders, asserting a collective desire for a "real substantive change" rather than merely switching between parties, reinforcing the need to unite under shared values rather than partisanship.
"They kind of want this cycle of ADHD. Nobody's able to hold onto a thought or a story."
"This man was betrayed by the people closest to him, people that he helped to put into power."
"We really love these new 'Make America Christian Again' hats."
"We merged the subscription tier into one Club Candace tier for $11.99 a month."
"We hope and pray that Trump comes out of the cave."